Search for: "STATE v MILLER" Results 3341 - 3360 of 5,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 1:13 pm
  Toward that end, the Northern District of Ohio recently gave us twin opinions applying the learned intermediary doctrine under the laws of California and Mississippi, and the district court found that the defendants in both cases were entitled to summary judgment.In Miller v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm by Andy Sellars
The case went up to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, which issued what is still the best opinion in favor of these constitutional arguments, Glik v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Phoenix, 154 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 1998) (applying void-for-vagueness analysis in a nonpublic forum); Miller v. [read post]
In particular, we argued that unlike prayers used to open legislative sessions at the state legislative level (one of which was upheld by the Supreme Court, largely on the basis of unbroken historical tradition, in Marsh v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Schmid, The Real Shariah Risk: Why the United States Cannot Afford to Miss the Islamic Finance Moment, (University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 2013, No. 3, 2013).Davi S. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ken White
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
 And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
They share either of two characteristics: (1) the definition of the banned communication usually tracks the definition of obscenity as defined by the Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:41 am by Roy Black
Jones) or third party business records (US v. [read post]