Search for: "STATE v. SCOTT" Results 3341 - 3360 of 6,290
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
The International Court of Justice's Decision in Bosnia v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am by Kiera Flynn
Taney, author of the landmark decision in Dred Scott. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:17 pm by Steve Hall
Ohio State University Professor Michelle Alexander told me it was the Plessy v Ferguson of our time, referencing the 1896 decision to justify racial segregation. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
Schnapper's interview of Lily Ledbetter, the plaintiff in Ledbetter v. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
Coan has this editorial on Hein v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
” [Andrew Koppelman, Balkinization on why he thinks Justice William Brennan might have preferred the “Fairness for All” bill (earlier) to the Equality Act; Scott Shackford] “Ohio state trooper, who is black, repeatedly sexually harasses women while on duty, gets fired. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:21 am by Erin Miller
United States, in which the Court recently granted cert. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:56 am by South Florida Lawyers
Onward inside the button-down mind of the Resplendently Robed Ones we go.......Quiroga v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
Schnapper's interview of Lily Ledbetter, the plaintiff in Ledbetter v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 2:27 pm
Jackson has this column in today's Boston Globe on the Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by Kathryn McCann - Guest
” Background Petitioner Glen Scott Milner lives near Indian Island, a small island in the State of Washington that houses one of the three naval magazines in which the Navy maintains non-nuclear explosives. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The linchpin of Mostyn J’s conclusions in his recent series of judgments is (a) that the correct interpretation of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 is that financial remedy proceedings which are not concerned with child maintenance are and should always have been heard in public or as if in public, and (b) that, even if this is not right, the 2009 rule change which admitted accredited journalists to hearings of financial remedy proceedings rendered them public hearings. [read post]