Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 3341 - 3360 of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Her dissent drew deeply from originalist theory and sources similar to Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
United States and argues that “the lopsided win illustrates the need for a federal statute defining the default mens rea (guilty mind) to be proven in criminal cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
Both opinions, like Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:40 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Lee v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
On February 23, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hertz v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:53 am by Erin Miller
        At a speech at Montana State University yesterday, Justice Scalia said that judges are not qualified to decide “the leading moral questions of the day” and that the big dividing line in the United States is between “those who believe [the Constitution] does not change and those who think it evolves. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Young, 13-95, the state-on-top habeas case asking whether (1) a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm by Sheila McCorkle - Guest
Although the Court held a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
  Our mission is to show that originalism leads to Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
” Solicitor General’s PerspectiveMalcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, supporting neither party’s theory. [read post]