Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 5,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 7:05 am
A search and seizure § 1983 claim accrues on the date of the search. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
WrightDocket: 11-748Issue(s): (1) Whether search warrants for a business that shares multi-occupancy buildings with others violate the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment where the warrants fail to identify the offices, floors or areas to be searched or the specific items to be seized, despite the officer’s knowledge of the business’s location within the buildings and the limited portion of the business under investigation; and (2)… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:25 am
As you know, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects us all from unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
In addition, search warrants were executed at eight residences in San Diego; Spring Valley, Calif.; National City, Calif.; Imperial Beach, Calif.; and Chula Vista, Calif.. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:32 am
The current view of what constitutes a search or seizure under the 4th Amendment was articulated in 1968 in Katz v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm
The question before the Court was where the Fourth Amendment draws a line between a valid search and seizure and one that violates the Constitution. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:30 pm
” He also said search-and-seizure, consent search and arrest matters would draw defense scrutiny. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:06 am
A search warrant was obtained and executed, and child pornography was found on several devices seized from Baird's home. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:57 am
Generally speaking, however, the case dealt with search and seizure issues, though there was also a Miranda issue. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:34 pm
" In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that police cannot attach a GPS device to a criminal suspect's car to track their movements without first obtaining a search warrant. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
The Fourth Amendment guarantees persons the right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…" Jones' vehicle is his "effect. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:14 pm
The warrant authorized the GPS to be installed within 10 days of the issuance of the search warrant. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:53 am
Jones,(text of opinion) the US Supreme Court voted that it is a violation of an individual's rights to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures to have a GPS tracking device placed upon his car without a warrant.I'm a little surprised that this decision came out unanimously. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
If you are a criminal defense attorney who does any work in the area of searches and seizures, you really need to take a few minutes to read Scalia’s critique of the concurrences because he compares and contrasts several key search and seizure cases so succinctly. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:23 am
(a) The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:14 am
Where there was an altercation outside the house where defendant threatened to “get my gun,” tribal police had probable cause for issuance of a search warrant for the house for a gun. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:39 am
As for that 50% rate in search and seizure cases, the prosecution stays on the right side of that figure in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:41 pm
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
Moreover, the common law doesn’t seem to provide an answer: The common law of searches and seizures provided a defense to a civil tort action, not an independent cause of action. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
Justice Scalia’s majority opinion, joined by Justices Roberts, Kennedy and Thomas, focused on the language of the Fourth Amendment, that expresses the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, paper, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…. [read post]
