Search for: "State Bank v. United States"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 7,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2015, 7:31 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:50 am
Bottom line: A covered business method (CBM) proceeding is a post patent grant proceeding at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
On June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of the United States, in Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 1:41 pm
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am
Gist and Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc.Case Number: 13-cv-01833 (United States District Court for the Northen District of Georgia)Case Filed: May 31, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-55 SEC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:32 pm
Those requiring court approval of private FLSA settlements regularly base their analysis on a pair of Supreme Court cases: Brooklyn Savings Bank v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
A divided Fourth Circuit has ruled, in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:09 am
[could potentially complicate] matters for President Vladimir V. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:32 am
She suffered from not having enough Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits for 14 years after the death of husband, until she finally went to her local United States Social Security Administration (SSA) branch office and tried to find out what happened. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:27 pm
” 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:24 am
The IRS lost in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
” Judge Rakoff also rejected the argument that the allegedly misleading statements about the company’s business and management were mere “opinion” or “puffery,” stating that “where (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company’s integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the company. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
In an en banc decision from the Seventh Circuit in Boim v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
See, Baldoria v. [read post]
