Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 3341 - 3360 of 85,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2023, 9:45 am by Sean A. Stokes
[v] The waiver permits subgrantees to fulfill the LOC requirement (or any alternative permitted under the waiver) by utilizing any United States credit union that is insured by the National Credit Union Administration and that has a credit union safety rating issued by Weiss of B− or better. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Addressing the arguably preemptive effect of CLIA, the PR argues that CLIA neither expressly nor impliedly repealed FDA’s authority over IVDs manufactured by laboratories. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:46 pm by David Klein
On October 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in True Health Chiropractic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 10:52 am by Steven Cohen
Also, the defendant argues that Cornell did not apply the ACE-V method reliably. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 easyGroup’s claim, lodged in the Chancery Division of the High Court of England and Wales [easyGroup v Easy Life, case ref IL-2023-000156], stated that not only were the band using the EASYLIFE mark but that they had also promoted their ‘Life's a Beach’ tour, in 2021 and 2022, with a poster, merchandise and website showing a plane in the style of EasyJet's [registered] orange. easyGroup argued that the band was “riding on the coat… [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
Coinbase asserts that this situation arises frequently, and it argues that the circuits are divided: While the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rothman v Sandra Radna, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 33670(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152678/2023Judge: Lynn R. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
Providers requested a temporary injunction, arguing that the abortion restrictions violated state constitutional law and free speech. [read post]