Search for: "State v. Center" Results 3341 - 3360 of 20,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 7:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Scaling Commercial Law in Indian Country Texas A&M Law Review, Forthcoming Number of pages: 38 Posted: 21 Sep 2020 Working Paper Series Marc Lane Roark Southern University Law Center McGirt v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 8:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
During his confirmation hearing when Senator Hirono asked him if he was thinking of the Rice v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
On July 26, 2017, the California Supreme Court issued its order denying the losing appellants’ (Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity) request for depublication of the opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 6:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Mark Egerman (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Avoiding Confrontation on SSRN. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Nicole Mazzocco
In Frankfurth v Detroit Medical Center, No. 305500, the Michigan Court of Appeals examined whether a circuit court may hear a motion for reconsideration of its order transferring venue, after the court has entered its order transferring venue. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Taxpayers who paid into Los Angeles's illegally-imposed telephone user tax will get their refunds, after a ruling today from the California Supreme Court ruling in Ardon v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:51 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
October 25, 2018) (purported class actions on behalf of South Carolina towns and counties alleging telecommunications companies have failed to properly bill, collect, and remit 911 charges from its business customers that are owed to the county’s or city’s consolidated 911 centers) Rush v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm by Dan Ernst
Peck, cases on state bills of credit in the Jacksonian era, the Legal Tender cases, and Pollock v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A portion of that law that regulates the centers' speech violates the First AmendmentThe case is The Evergreen Association v. [read post]