Search for: "State v. Cooke"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 3,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm
Siracusano (2011) and Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[40] What is Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome? [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:23 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 5:40 am
http://bit.ly/Q3mYPY (Dennis Kiker) States Enacting Rules on Use of Electronic Data in Medical Liability Cases – http://bit.ly/NztMYc (IHealthBeat) Technology Review: A FrameWork for Managing People, Technology and Processes - http://bit.ly/NrQlhv (Lynn Frances) Tips for Identifying and Preserving ESI – http://bit.ly/OXF9Xj (James Bernard, Michael Quartararo, Jason Vinokur) Twitter Contempt Sanctions Increase Need for Social Media Governance Plan… [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 1:59 am
A recent Australian decision in the case of Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156[2] highlights the problem. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Decisions from the Federal Circuit Court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
See Madey v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:06 pm
ATF declares that its Final Rule at issue before the Supreme Court in Garland v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
When she lost the burden of proof argument, she was cooked. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
., DeNeui v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Onions were distributed to wholesalers, restaurants, and retail stores in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm
The US typically has four levels of jurisdiction Federal, State, county and local. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Cook County v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]