Search for: "State v. Still"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 44,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
The court gives several hypotheticals of how consumers might use the Comphy mark to find linens on Amazon and still not be confused. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:14 pm
Red Families v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:36 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 4:01 am
Lewy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:52 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
Thanks to the virtual telegraph, I’ve had the transcript in R (Coombes) v Secretary of State for CLG and Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 (Admin) for a few days (but it still does not appear on Baili, although, I gather, is available on Westlaw and the like), but a variety of circumstances (man flu/an excellent conference/family holiday culminating in a dramatic late night trip to a&e with my eldest, who’s absolutely fine, thanks) have prevented me from… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled recently in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:00 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:11 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:00 pm
The Court ruled in Georgia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
”) State ex rel. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
The evidence was that he may have been intellectually limited, but still was competent, as the state trial court found. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 4:21 am
" Mendoza v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:50 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Am I still guilty? [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
