Search for: "Steel v. Steel"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 3,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2007, 9:23 am
Blake (not approved for publication).On consideration of a claim by the plaintiff ("Erachem") to vacate an arbitration award entered in favor of United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC Local 12517-04 (the "Union"), and the Union's counterclaim to affirm the award, the judge DENIED Erachem's motion, and GRANTED the Union's motion.A member of the Union… [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
Steele v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Huron Valley Steel, Reading Company, and Cooper Industries (the petitioner in a predecessor case, Cooper Industries v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 5:37 am
AK Steel timely appealed. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
In National Steel & Shipbuilding v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
Separately, Judge Moore discussed a comparison of Quillen/Webster v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 5:45 am
Howard v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:17 am
Steel. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
"Standing to sue is part of the common understanding of what it takes to make a justiciable case," Steel Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 12:07 am
It's also worth noting this line from last week's decision in Mass v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
Burch v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Cir. 2002), citing Tualatin Electric v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
The Foundation submitted an amicus brief in support of EPA in Mass. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
[TTABlog Note: See the CAFC's decision in a companion case (here), holding that the term STEELBUILDING.COM is not generic for Applicant's services, but is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning.]April 18, 2007 - 2 PM: Diamonique Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 2:58 pm
Familiar examples, to name just a few, include Justice Harlan's famous dissenting opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Accord Bell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 7:03 pm
US Steel Corp Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland AGE DISCRIMINATION; OHIO LAW: retired employees failed to make claim; SJ affirmed 07a0091a.06 2007/03/06 Petty v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:25 pm
The wonderfully named Steel Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:27 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 12:37 pm
Sinochem Int'l Co. v. [read post]
