Search for: "Stephens v. United States"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 3,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
U.S. defendants can request access to the evidence, but there is, as Judge Stephen Smith has detailed, increasing deference in federal courts to so-called "law enforcement privilege"—the withholding of information about evidence-gathering techniques during a trial—can extend to software and prevent its examination for errors. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Question: Based on your extensive research, do you think that Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong’s major take-away points (beyond United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
An application for permission to appeal has been lodged in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
Our role is very clear: We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:04 am
In his majority opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:58 am
Huffman’s article Margin of Error: Potential Pitfalls of the Ruling in The Prosecutor v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The case is about whether challenges to a federal regulation known as the “waters of the United States” rule must be filed in federal district courts. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:40 am
United States: CSLI, Third-Party Doctrine, and Privacy in the Twenty-first Century 14 Liberty U. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm
” Justice Stephen Breyer echoed Sotomayor’s concerns. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Supreme Court held in Jones v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Ashcroft (Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 10-98). [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 1:48 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:45 pm
But whereas Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion for the Court in Coleman v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
United States, with Justice Clarence Thomas watching from the audience. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:21 pm
STEPHEN E. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:20 am
The Dewey-Stassen contest was limited to one question: Should the Communist Party be outlawed in the United States? [read post]
