Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan*"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
------- Title: Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
For example, in Hynes-O’Sullivan v O’Driscoll [1988] IR 436, 449, 450, [1989] ILRM 349, 360, 361, Henchy J declined to expand the defence of qualified privilege, holding that the existing rules properly reflected that constitutional balance (emphasis added): I have no difficulty in rejecting the submission, which has only slender judicial support, that the occasion is one of qualified privilege if the person making the communication honestly believes that… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Sullivan; no defense bar as such when the case came down, when such cases were dealt w/by private detectives and not 1A lawyers—thought [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
We may not be representative of different companies b/c we are small & receive a small number of requests that vary in what they ask for—readership over a period of time v. individual info. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
From Marcus v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Sullivan that libel law should be absolutely rejected, at least as to matters of public concern. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am
Sullivan (1964) (rejecting the view that libel is categorically unprotected, and holding that the libel exception requires a showing that the libelous accusations be “of and concerning” a particular person); Garrison v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
Sullivan of Portland, Oregon for this contribution. Reed v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Precedent in Moran v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
” At Bloomberg BNA, Chris Marr looks at American Business USA Corp. v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:34 pm
The Supreme Court, see United States v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:23 am
In 1958, in Commissioner v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:37 am
Board of Education.DOCUMENTARIESSilver GavelA Call to Act: Ledbetter v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
” In short, as summed up by the court in People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 6:39 am
The viewpoint discrimination doctrine is confused and difficult, borne out by a few Supreme Court rulings over the years, including Rust v. [read post]
