Search for: "Superior Court of California" Results 3341 - 3360 of 10,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2016, 5:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
On 10 June 2010, in opposition to the wife's cross motion, the husband moved by order to show cause and prayed for an order directing his wife to immediately return the children at the conclusion of the 2010 school year, for an order directing that the minor children reside with him pending the jurisdictional decision of the New York Court, and for an order requesting that the Superior Court of the State of California vacate any and all orders issued and to… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 11:59 am by Bernadette Duran-Brown
Superior Court case (which is being heard on May 3), we should have the answers to the above-questions as well. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:03 pm
Here is the relevant language from the Court's order:The Washington Supreme Court diverged from California v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
Defendant COA, Inc. d/b/a Coaster Company of America ("Coaster") of Santa Fe Springs, California is accused of infringing Kimball's Trademark KIMBALL, Reg. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:37 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Peters filed a defamation action against the employee in the Small Claims Division of the Santa Clara County Superior Court, alleging defamation occurring on November 3, 2011 (the date of the EEOC Notice of Charge of Discrimination). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:26 am by Nassiri Law
According to their complaint filed with the superior court, they were hired to perform audits and find issues within the department. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:10 am by Sharifi Firm, PLC
More Blog Posts: California Court Holds Dodger Stadium Not Liable in Slip and Fall Case, Southern California Injury Lawyer Blog, April 11, 2016 California Appellate Court Upholds Judgment in Favor of Hotel Where Plaintiffs Injured by Independent Security Guards During Election Protested on Hotel Premises, Southern California Injury Lawyer Blog, March 18, 2016 [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:06 am
That gathering chose the previously resigned (Episcopalese for "retired") Bishop of Northern California, the Rt. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” After almost nine years of litigation, Judge Wiley granted Allstate’s motion to decertify both an off-the-clock and wage statement class because none of the multiple trial plans suggested by Plaintiff complied with the requirements in the California Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Duran v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:32 pm by Neumann Law Group
More Blog Posts: California Resident Sues Over Tennis Court Noise, California Injury Lawyer Blog, April 13, 2016. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:32 pm by Neumann Law Group
More Blog Posts: California Resident Sues Over Tennis Court Noise, California Injury Lawyer Blog, April 13, 2016. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:25 am
Superior Court, S230051.How not to behave at oral argument, here:{Fn.2} [Pro per appellant] requested oral argument in this case and appeared in the courtroom. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:23 am by John Bisnar
According to a report in the Stockton Record, the wrongful death lawsuit was filed in Orange County Superior Court by the son of Robert Lampkins, who died August 15, 2015, alleging that the nursing home knowingly withheld care to the elderly man who was suffering from severe bed sores that had become infected and ultimately caused his death. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Nissan North America Inc. et al., case number BC609400, in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.) was filed on February 8, 2016. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:07 pm by Ruthann Robson
California today, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District of California reversed the conclusion of Los Angeles Superior Court Judge... [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:23 am by Joshua A. Stein
Website Accessibility Obligations Continue to Become More Certain In a decision on the opposite end of the country last month that will not be met with the same reaction by businesses, the San Bernardino Superior Court in California held that a retailer violated the ADA (and the Unruh Act under California law) because its website was inaccessible to individuals who are blind or have low vision. [read post]