Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 3341 - 3360 of 21,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2013, 5:44 am by Howard Friedman
But if accepted, this theory would mean that every government regulation could be subject to the compelling interest and narrowest possible means test of RFRA based simply on an asserted religious basis for objection. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Also surprising: that defendants didn’t focus on the part of the Gordon & Breach test that requires competition between the parties—though there is obviously a solid case for competition here, in that defendants seem to make more money when plaintiff makes less and vice versa.)Next, defendants argued that NJ PURE didn’t allege literal falsity, and also didn’t allege that consumers were actually misled, and thus the complaint failed. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:30 am
  The plaintiff could not prove that the failure to warn physicians to test and substitute an alternative antibiotic for penicillin-sensitive patients was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s skin condition. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  The type of expert testimony proffered by the plaintiff here is typical of how plaintiffs try to establish class certification in an insurance case, often unsuccessfully. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
       they exercised substantial control over some part of the design, testing, manufacture, packaging, or labeling in a way that caused the plaintiff harm;2. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In the Matter of Teamsters Local 445 v Town of Monroe: Certain civil service positions in the classified service are placed in the "exempt" class reflecting the duties of the position are of a confidential nature and requires personal qualities that cannot practicably be tested by an examination. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” But is that true because the treatment has been “tested and disproven, or rather, is it because no study regarding its efficacy has been conducted yet, and thus, scientific literature is devoid of a conclusion? [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In the Matter of Teamsters Local 445 v Town of Monroe: Certain civil service positions in the classified service are placed in the "exempt" class reflecting the duties of the position are of a confidential nature and requires personal qualities that cannot practicably be tested by an examination. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed, without costs, a ruling by Supreme Court which denied the Plaintiff's petition to annul a determination of the City of New York Reasonable Accommodation Appeals Panel [Citywide Panel] denying [1] Plaintiff's  request for a reasonable accommodation from the New York City Board of Education's [DOE] COVID-19 vaccine mandate, [2] Plaintiff's motion for limited discovery, and [3] dismissed the proceeding… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed, without costs, a ruling by Supreme Court which denied the Plaintiff's petition to annul a determination of the City of New York Reasonable Accommodation Appeals Panel [Citywide Panel] denying [1] Plaintiff's  request for a reasonable accommodation from the New York City Board of Education's [DOE] COVID-19 vaccine mandate, [2] Plaintiff's motion for limited discovery, and [3] dismissed the proceeding… [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, allowing the director defendants to develop and test the defense’s allegations at trial. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:06 pm
  That exclusion negated coverage for a loss "caused directly or indirectly" by an ordinance or law requiring an insured "to test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize, or in any way respond to, or assess the effects of, pollutants. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:18 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" Another puzzle followed the 1991 amendments to Title VII, which incorporated a motivating-factor causation standard, abandoning the "but-for" test that the Supreme Court had adopted a few years earlier. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Burke asked whether Lake Holiday Security could conduct field sobriety tests and issue citations for driving while intoxicated. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:15 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Burke asked whether Lake Holiday Security could conduct field sobriety tests and issue citations for driving while intoxicated. [read post]