Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 5,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
See Hall v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner: Latest Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office: Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] John Cross v IC EA/2010/0101. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Robart, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit), and Huawei v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:55 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
[Rooney v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am
Williams (discussed here), holding that the Adam Walsh Act was punitive, and couldn’t be applied retroactively to people who committed offenses prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
Bundling has different consequences.Competition—as an economist, we look for cross-elasticity of demand. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In Kelo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:46 am
This means that without steps, such as sequential unmasking, being taken to try to avoid hindsight bias, the expert becomes vulnerable on cross-examination.Citing Arnold J’s comments in American Science v Rapiscan, Anna also noted that care still needs to taken with sequential unmasking. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:34 am
(I used to waffle about the parallel issue in connection with Cohen v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Companies such as Uber, Lyft and Sidecar represent a cross-section of the transportation sector of a rapidly growing marketplace: the so-called “sharing economy. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 10:33 am
Gauthier v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
Stephen Bright and Sia Sanneh: 'Gideon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:01 pm
When a witness testifies in FTC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:53 pm
A quick, non-exclusive list of common examples we frequently encounter are: Facts alleged by the declarant without foundation, i.e. without personal and direct sensory observation of the matter asserted (e.g. my husband smacked the child because I saw the child had a bruise when I picked her up from his house); Conclusory statements subject to less abstract, more specific ways of conveying the information (e.g. he is an abuser, or she is a liar); Legal conclusions that invade the… [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 1:49 pm
They’re not people who make causal statements going about their daily business. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 10:17 pm
They’re not people who make causal statements going about their daily business. [read post]
