Search for: "United States v. Alter"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Federal Court Seized of Admiralty Jurisdiction Nonetheless Dismisses In Favor of Canadian Litigation
28 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Here's the background statement from TD 9564: The United States Supreme Court has recognized the highly factual nature of determining whether expenditures are for capital improvements or for ordinary repairs. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:18 am
Bel Canto Design, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
Further, states may not alter existing Medicaid eligibility levels for adults and children in effect as of March 23, 2010, until a state has put into operation a new “health exchange” — a kind of marketplace in which families can shop for health insurance at affordable rates. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In Fiji Rugby Union v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
See Zamsky v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:57 am
Here is a copy of the Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am
Mr & Mrs Potter (senior) acquired a farm and farmhouse as a single unit in 1947. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am
Mr & Mrs Potter (senior) acquired a farm and farmhouse as a single unit in 1947. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:06 am
(For the leading case on these issues in California, see Moeller v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
It’s not retaliation against him, though, because he claims the address actually belongs to a “United States Judge” (by which he means a state judge, even though any lawyer would interpret that as a reference to a federal judge), and that I am PUTTING A JUDGE IN DANGER. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:49 am
When a transaction occurs in the United States, courts have been permitting claims under the antifraud rule. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
United States - and it was a pretty big deal. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
In this way, any interference was of his own making (this argument had been deployed and accepted in McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Raniere v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
The verb “abridge” is used as a synonym for discrimination in exactly this way in the Fifteenth Amendment which says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
This new section on infill projects will not apply until the state has developed infill guidelines. [read post]
