Search for: "United States v. California" Results 3341 - 3360 of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by Venkat
(A case pending in front of the United States Supreme Court may answer this question. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
”[19]  Since that time the Supreme Court of California has not taken a case to resolve this conflict over the existing Indian family doctrine between the state Courts of Appeals and the state legislature. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
New Hampshire has the highest level of outbound smuggling at 65 percent of consumption, likely due to its relatively low tax rates and proximity to high-tax states in the northeastern United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am by Guest Author
  Illinois, like California, is one of several states where agency shop arrangements are authorized in the public sector. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 10:08 am by Guest Author
  Illinois, like California, is one of several states where agency shop arrangements are authorized in the public sector. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
United States, No. 16-7806, Justice Gorsuch concurred in the remand for further consideration in light of the position asserted by the Acting Solicitor General. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150358 (ED CA, Oct. 18, 2013), a California federal magistrate judge allowed an Orthodox Jewish inmate to proceed with his complaint that it took 147 days before he was furnished with kosher meals.In Phillips v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Sands
California does not apply and neither does the 9th Cir’s decision in US v. [read post]