Search for: "United States v. State of Washington"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 9,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2014, 5:23 am
v=etXYIozoACw The United States Supreme Court’s Decision on Non-exempt Employee’s Work Day This past Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:37 am
At the Concurring Opinions blog, Gerard Magliocca has a post titled “Interesting Cases You’ve Never Heard of – The Pueblo Indians” in which he discusses the Court’s 1876 opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
When the Supreme Court hears Kirtsaeng's case, it will seek to resolve the discrepancy in the Copyright Law and the issue of whether the Copyright Law applies to a copy that was made and legally acquired abroad and then imported into the United States, SCOUTUSblog.com reports. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am
Its initial purpose was to combat organized crime in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:25 pm
The court noted, Congress in 2005 declared “the policy of the United States that time-based pricing and other forms of demand response . . . shall be encouraged. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:25 pm
The court noted, Congress in 2005 declared “the policy of the United States that time-based pricing and other forms of demand response . . . shall be encouraged. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 9:56 am
These terms have been held to be binding by the United States Supreme Court in Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 2:15 am
2-7-2008 New Jersey:First Responders, Security for Ports, Transit and Infrastructure Among Key Areas on Administration's Chopping BlockFebruary 6, 2008 -- WASHINGTON - United States Senators Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), both members of the Senate Budget Committee, today assailed President Bush's Fiscal Year 2009 budget proposal for its drastic cuts in state and local homeland security funding that is critical to high-threat,… [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:04 am
The case, Levin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
In 1914, in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
United States - 4/28/14. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Certiorari stage documents: § Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit) § Petition for certiorari § Brief in opposition § Petitioners’ reply § Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States § Amicus brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation § Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar § Amicus brief of the Washington Legal Foundation… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am
At The Atlantic, Sarah Seo argues that Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
The United States, as one of about 160 countries that signed the treaty, is obligated to notify foreign nationals who are arrested in the United States of their right to speak with their embassies. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:08 am
United States to argue for a “more majestic conception” of the Fourth Amendment focused on protecting political liberty. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Setser v. [read post]
