Search for: "Will Thomas"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 66,809
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 8:01 am
” Justices Neil Gorsuch authored a concurrence, which was joined by Clarence Thomas and Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
But it's worth noting that scholars and legal commentators such as Indiana University law professor Gerard Magliocca and my Cato Institute colleague Thomas Berry have put forward strong arguments that legacy preferences at public institutions are banned by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:11 am
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Lawyers with supreme court business paid Clarence Thomas aide via Venmo (Stephanie Kirchgaessner, The Guardian) Judges Confused by Supreme Court’s Historical Test for Gun Laws (Lydia Wheeler, Bloomberg Law) Firing of gay Catholic school teacher could test latest Supreme Court ruling (Rachel Weiner, The Washington Post) How a Second Amendment case at the Supreme Court is putting gun rights groups in a jam (John Fritze, USA Today) A monumental… [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
Putting aside that this is how book tours work everywhere, the complaint underscores that Alito and Thomas defenders think the problem is "justices making money" as opposed to "justices getting paid by parties trying to influence the judges. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
On July 11, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
On July 11, 2023, New York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Heck, even Justice Thomas occasionally found himself in the company of the left wing. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:50 am
Thomas L. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:12 pm
The "first" to hold that honor was Judge Lawson Thomas, appointed to the City of Miami Black Municipal Court in 1950. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Despite concurring with the Court’s judgment in the Fry case, Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, expressed concerns about the Court’s hypothetical questions, suggesting that they might cause confusion. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
And while then U.S. ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield gave a UN General Assembly speech asserting, “We have seen videos of Russian forces moving exceptionally lethal weaponry into Ukraine, which has no place on the battlefield. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:33 pm
“The Missing Originalism in the Court’s Racial-Preferences Opinions; There’s still work to do in restoring the original meaning of the 14th Amendment; Only Justice Thomas tried to do that in the Harvard admissions case”: Dan McLaughlin has this essay online at National Review. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:55 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Retired Judge Thomas Griffith will informally mediate with the parties in the case brought by Judge Pauline Newman against the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:55 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Retired Judge Thomas Griffith will informally mediate with the parties in the case brought by Judge Pauline Newman against the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Justice Thomas kept his focus on historical arguments. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:51 am
Did you know that Thomas Jefferson suffered from severe headaches that many historians think were likely migraine episodes – he even dealt with one right before writing the Declaration of Independence! [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Indeed, Justice Thomas, writing for the majority in Samia, likewise makes “historical practice” a pillar of the Court’s analysis, albeit a history Justice Barrett finds disposable. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch (discussed on the Forum here); and Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:31 am
Bebchuk, Alon Brav, Wei Jiang, and Thomas Keusch (discussed on the Forum here); and Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:53 am
Thomas McCarthy shares his thoughts (below) on the Supreme Court's "Bad Spaniels" decision (pdf here), in the hope of stimulating discussion (in the comments) as to what readers think will be the impact of the case on the use of marks in "expressive" works. [read post]
