Search for: "York v York"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 52,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2023, 8:18 pm
Background In Greiff v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
In this Commentary, I show how the tradition-entrenching methods the Court employed to decide New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:42 pm
Supreme Court in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
New York, 198 U. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:35 am
Recent years have seen an uptick in people worried that the standard set for defamation in New York Times v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 7:12 am
Carroll v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:34 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court rejects challenge to California pork industry restriction (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Moore v Harper parties split on whether US Supreme Court should drop case (CJ Staff, The Carolina Journal) Supreme Court Throws Out Fraud Convictions in Albany Scandals (Adam Liptak & Luis Ferré-Sadurní, The New York Times) Supreme Court rules against Puerto Rican journalists seeking records from financial oversight board… [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:55 am
This is the latest chapter in a series of cases that began with New York State Rifle Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:00 am
FAILED TO SERVE “NON-PRIME” NOTICE WITHIN THE REQUIRED 90-150 DAY PERIODUnder New York law, before a non-primary residence proceeding can be brought against a rent-stabilized tenant, a landlord is required to serve a “notice of non-renewal” 90-150 days prior to the lease’s expiration.In 211 E. 11 LLC v D'Antoni, after the New York County Civil Court (Housing Part) dismissed the owner’s case for having missed that “window… [read post]
12 May 2023, 4:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:00 pm
And since they failed to object to that outcome for some two years, the AD1 thought the plaintiffs had “implicitly ratified the settlement agreement by making no formal objection” for that entire time.Absent “fraud, collusion or mistake,” the AD1 didn’t think there was any basis to vacate the settlement, “simply because it was not as favorable” as the plaintiffs there would have liked.And that settles that.# # #DECISIONS. v City of New York [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:43 pm
One of the strongest aspects of this litigation is that it has a case right on point: Clinton v New York (1998), which held the line-item veto unconstitutional. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:00 am
In New York Civ. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:00 am
In New York Civ. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISION902 Assoc. v Union Sq. 902 Suites, LLC [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
Does the New York Statute compel the Guggenheim and MoMA to exhibit Picasso’s Le Moulin de la Galette and Boy Leading a Horse with placards indicating their history? [read post]
10 May 2023, 11:00 pm
"# # ## # #DECISIONA.M. v New York City Dept. of Educ. [read post]
