Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 3361 - 3380 of 5,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2012, 6:25 am by Cathy Moran, Esq.
Subsection 1329(a)(4) provides that obtaining health insurance not already deducted in the means test justifies a modification of a confirmed plan: (4) reduce amounts to be paid under the plan by the actual amount expended by the debtor to purchase health insurance for the debtor (and for any dependent of the debtor if such dependent does not otherwise have health insurance coverage) if the debtor documents the cost of such insurance and demonstrates… [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 11:19 pm by Sean Hanover
Determination of child support is a matter of state posted payment schedules, and is based on (a) amount of custody each parent has, (b) the income of each parent, and (c) the best interest of the child.3. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 2:01 pm
On 24 May 2007, B’s will was admitted to probate, a will contest proceeding, and letters testamentary issued to C. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
  Here's the language of that new paragraph, which took effect today: (2)(i) Notwithstanding paragraph one of this subdivision, for claims that would otherwise be subject to the provisions of paragraph one the provisions of this paragraph shall instead apply, with respect to any claim occurring from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012 in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, including their adjacent waters, with… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
  Here's the language of that new paragraph, which took effect today: (2)(i) Notwithstanding paragraph one of this subdivision, for claims that would otherwise be subject to the provisions of paragraph one the provisions of this paragraph shall instead apply, with respect to any claim occurring from October 26, 2012 through November 15, 2012 in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, including their adjacent waters, with… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:27 am by Robert Kraft
Part C: Medicare Advantage (MA) MA is purchased through a private insurer, and covers parts A and B plus extras such as vision and dental services. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:20 am
(b) When an employee grants his/her consent, payment by any electronic means will be allowed at no cost to the employee. 8.- Profit Sharing. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Sections 164.514(b) and (c) of the Privacy Rule contain the implementation specifications that a covered entity must follow to meet the de-identification standard. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:32 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Deadline for the Towers Watson D&O Survey is Approaching: As I have previously noted on this site, Towers Watson is once again conducting its annual D&O insurance survey. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 9:21 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
§ 36B(b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(A)(i), that phrase does not have the exclusionary meaning Cannon attributes to it. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:43 pm
 § 36B(b)(2)(A), (c)(2)(A)(i), that phrase does not have the exclusionary meaning Cannon attributes to it. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:20 am
The case involved a class action filed by an annuity beneficiary alleging that the insurer sold his mother and similarly situated plaintiffs a deferred annuity that did not comply with disclosure requirements of individual annuity contracts pursuant to California Insurance Code (“CIC”) §§ 10127.10(c) and 10127.13.The parties do not dispute that: (a) the deferred annuity provides that it is a certificate issued under a group annuity contract… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
"   Once the prerogative of theconsumer, confusion is nowa matter for the judge ...The Court then cited cases including esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line [2008] RPC 34, Re GE Trade Mark [1973] RPC 297 and Gut Springenheide GmbH v Oberkreisdirektor des Kreises Steinfurt (Case C-210/96) from which it was clear that the ultimate issue of confusion is one for the judge, rather than witnesses, but that a judge can reach the conclusion in the absence of evidence from… [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The carrier’s position in this respect may be particularly understandable when it is paying defense fees under the policy’s corporate reimbursement coverage (usually referred to as Side B coverage); in those circumstances, the insurance is providing a funding mechanism for the insured company’s own indemnification obligations. [read post]