Search for: "BARRETT"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 5:53 am
“Notre Dame calendars show more events not listed on Amy Coney Barrett’s Senate paperwork”: Andrew Kaczynski and Em Steck of CNN have this report. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett, Vowing Independence, Is Haunted by Trump’s Demands (Carl Hulse, The New York Times) Amy Coney Barrett grilled on voting rights as 2020 election is underway (Joan Biskupic, CNN) How Conservative Is Amy Coney Barrett? [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:27 am
(Barrett) no ha dicho ‘Roe se va mañana'”. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:03 am
But that’s a slam on the process, not Barrett, although it’s hard these days to separate the two. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Tuesday was Day 2 of the hearings on Amy Coney Barrett's nomination for the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Judge Amy Coney Barrett had not yet been nominated by President Trump. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:55 pm
Barrett, however, offered no such view on Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:18 pm
“Barrett emerges as the anti-Kavanaugh; Both parties had their reasons for pursuing a less drama-fueled Supreme Court confirmation hearing”: Burgess Everett and John Bresnahan of Politico have this report. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:12 pm
“To Democrats’ frustration, GOP predicts clear sailing as Barrett testimony ends”: Robert Barnes, Seung Min Kim, and Ann E. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 7:05 pm
“Amy Coney Barrett Won’t Say Trump’s Obvious Lawlessness Is Lawless; Her refusal to answer basic questions is not judicial independence; It’s aiding and abetting the president’s election fraud”: Dahlia Lithwick has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:55 pm
“Amy Coney Barrett Closes Out Testimony, on Track for Senate Approval; Republicans line up behind Supreme Court nominee while Democrats suggest she is a threat to widely accepted rights”: Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has this report. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 6:44 pm
“Delayed election, mail-in ballots and transfer of power: Barrett steers clear of Trump’s strike zone; The Supreme Court nominee was careful not to contradict legally dubious assertions by Trump or address political controversies that he stokes on Twitter. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:48 pm
And all to the sound of silence from Judge Barrett’s critics.We should not mince words. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:41 pm
“‘Severability’ Could Save Health Law, Graham Says and Barrett Seems to Agree; Warnings from Democrats that Republicans and their Supreme Court nominee threaten the Affordable Care Act elicited reassuring words from both Senator Lindsey Graham and Judge Amy Coney Barrett”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:34 pm
“Barrett, Vowing Independence, Is Haunted by Trump’s Demands; Judge Amy Coney Barrett is not the first Supreme Court nominee to profess her independence, but her task has been made far more complicated by the president who nominated her”: Carl Hulse of The New York Times has this news analysis. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 3:54 pm
Sources have speculated that the court’s decision in the case will likely be subject to review by the US Supreme Court, gaining particular importance in the context of this week’s confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:35 pm
Barrett: Yes. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
During his time, Senator Tillis spent several minutes speaking with Judge Barrett about her views on both patent and copyright law. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
During his time, Senator Tillis spent several minutes speaking with Judge Barrett about her views on both patent and copyright law. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:28 pm
A la vez que el Comité Judicial del Senado federal atiende las vistas de confirmación de Amy Coney Barrett —la nominada para ocupar la vacante en el Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos (TSEU)—, el pleno del supremo continúa sus trabajos y esta semana atendieron casos relacionados a las elecciones, los récords financieros del presidente Donald Trump, el caso sobre el censo y un caso sobre la pena de muerte. [read post]
