Search for: "Childs v. Childs" Results 3361 - 3380 of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
One answer can be found in a recent case, Walker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 1:35 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council House of Lords “A local authority's children's services unit could not purport to fulfil its duties to look after a homeless child merely by referring him to the homeless persons unit. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v T Court of Appeal “A child supervision order had an initial life of 12 months and could be extended for a further two years maximum. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (G) v Southwark London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 26; [2009] WLR (D) 159 “When a child aged 16 or 17 who had been excluded from his family home applied to the children's service department of the local authority for accommodation under s 20 of the Children Act 1989, and he satisfied all the requirements of [...] [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:04 am
Regina (M) v East Sussex County Council Queen’s Bench Division “The failure by a local authority to amend a child's statement of special educational needs during the year of his transfer between phases of schooling, and to name and specify the type of school was a breach of its statutory obligation. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am by K.O. Herston
Russell (herstontennesseefamilylaw.com) Alimony From Other Parent Not Considered Income for Child Support Purposes in Chattanooga: Ghorashi-Bajestani v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:29 pm by Daily Record Staff
The trial judge denied the motion and found Ward guilty of second-degree child abuse. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Brackeen threatened to take down not only the Indian Child Welfare Act, but vast swaths of federal Indian policy and federal law. [read post]
So, the fair hearing has a higher burden of proof than the initial investigation (fair preponderance of evidence v. some credible evidence). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:46 pm by Mike
Children - compentent witnesses R v BARKER [2010] CA The competence of a 4 year old child to give evidence was not in question. [read post]