Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 3361 - 3380 of 48,951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm by Christopher G. Hill
  After much effort and a threat of litigation, the Plaintiffs received documents from Dennis showing that Dennis inflated the costs of the materials prior to passing the costs along to the Marcuses. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:50 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
He won a case the Supreme Court of the United States in a landmark constitutional law case that upholds civil rights under the First Amendment, Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
  It is more a question of the benefits and costs of deliberate amendment avoidance than amendment “difficulty. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
 Following the principles endorsed by the Ontario Court of Appeal in Belton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  While the proposed rule would not prohibit PFOF (as Chair Gensler has previously publicly floated), the Commission acknowledged that the Order Competition Rule “would likely lead to a reduction of PFOF” and/or increase retail brokers’ order handling costs—“which could ultimately be passed on to individual investors. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
C Corporations provide a high level of protection from risk and allow for different classes of ownership but are disfavorable in terms of taxation and costs. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
She noted that although the Assistance Exception can operate to preserve coverage for claims otherwise precluded by the Insured v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am by Allan Blutstein
[s]o they do not internalize the costs of a wild goose chase like this one. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The prosecution against him was ultimately dismissed for government misconduct but not because Ellsberg's leak was constitutionally protected.The Court extended the logic of Pentagon Papers thirty years later in Bartnicki v. [read post]