Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 16,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Pena 115,000 150,005 0 0 265,005 James H. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:10 am
This is not a “ruling” of the Court and it does not have any precedential effect. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
by Dunstan H. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
(Jonathan H. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Doe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
”[10] It defined “alimony or separate maintenance payments” as any payment in cash if--(A)such payment is received by (or on behalf of) a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument, (B) the divorce or separation instrument does not designate such payment as a payment which is not includible in gross income under this section and not allowable as a deduction under section 215, (C)in the case of an individual legally separated from his spouse under a decree of divorce… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:15 am
”[10] It defined “alimony or separate maintenance payments” as any payment in cash if--(A)such payment is received by (or on behalf of) a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument, (B) the divorce or separation instrument does not designate such payment as a payment which is not includible in gross income under this section and not allowable as a deduction under section 215, (C)in the case of an individual legally separated from his spouse under a decree of divorce… [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
This exception does require that Medicare approved the eyeglasses or contact lenses. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:15 pm
The case law also does not support the defendant's position. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:27 pm
Martin H. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:13 am
But it does provide a better chance of securing an H-1B visa number. [read post]
31 May 2016, 12:32 pm
This last point is important, for Resolute is not merely disputing Greenpeace’s rhetorical claims or disputing its conclusions (though it does this). [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:57 pm
The rule does not prevent related employers (such as a parent company and its subsidiary) from filing petitions on behalf of the same alien for different positions, based on legitimate business need. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court.By MEG LAUGHLIN and JACOB H. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 6:36 am
[Inside Facebook; h/t Jim McCullagh on Twitter] You can access the key docs here: [pdf] (Settlement Agreement; Motion for Preliminary Approval). [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
After a nine-year legal battle, the Superior Court of Québec’s Justice Daniel H. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 12:30 pm
Lisa Washington, the 2021-22 William H. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 6:01 am
The MPRE is the proverbial mole hill, and the Bar exam is...no, not a mountain, it is just a freakin' ass-h*le. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:34 pm
Treatment, including issuing a prescription based solely on an online questionnaire, does not constitute an acceptable standard of care. [read post]
