Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
Thus, a project opponent simply showing substantial evidence supporting a “fair argument” that an otherwise-exempt project may have significant adverse environmental impacts does not defeat an exemption – the opponent must also make a “factual” showing to the satisfaction of the lead agency that “unusual circumstances” exist and have resulted in the potentially significant impacts. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
An accused simply does not have the right to stand in the shoes of another person, whose rights might have been violated. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | Litigation-Proof Patents: Avoiding the Most Common Patent Mistakes and Patent Portfolios: Quality, Creation, and Cost reviewed | Italy and San Marino’s friendship on IP is over| Problems and imperfections in biotech patenting: realities on the ground and trying to fix the system.Never too late 31 [week ending Sunday 1 February] -- Women in IP, a MIP’s perspective | Another linking reference to the CJEU | Catarina Holtz on… [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
Disputes between lenders and borrowers have involved, for example, (1) what is a dwelling? [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
The document does not, on its face, appear broad. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:50 am
Despite this language, a plaintiff could argue that the discovery stay does not apply in state court, and there are surprisingly few cases addressing this issue. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 11:21 am
Be aware that the cheapest bid does not necessarily equate with the best work. 3. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
* Graduated response in Australia: what does the draft code of practice say? [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 4:40 pm
It does not apply to sources that have been granted an exemption under LAC 33:III.501.B.4 due to having a maximum potential to emit less than 5 tons per year of any criteria permit and that otherwise meet the criteria set forth at Section 501.B.4. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 9:23 am
This time it does respond, but late, and only with a cursory denial which the FCC does not find credible. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
Ltd & ors (No 3) [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1, when Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones sought to prevent the publication and use of unauthorised photographs taken at their wedding. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:13 am
Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:17 am
DNL does not take into account variables that are becoming increasingly important. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:34 am
The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (the Istanbul Convention) entered into force on 1 August 2014. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 11:12 am
The Levine Trust demanded around $1.5 million based on a 2012 appraisal done in connection with a financing that valued the building around $33 million. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
” Id. at *1 (internal citations omitted). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:24 pm
Ford Motor Co., 421 U.S. 1, 4 (1975). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm
Id. at 1432–33. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
He does not challenge the rejections of claims 6-14 and 16-33.In re Imes, at *1-2. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:25 pm
The Board should exercise caution before advising parties that it does not wish to hear relevant evidence that the Board considers uninteresting or unhelpful. [read post]
