Search for: "Does v. United States of America"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 2:53 pm
Nor does it need to. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Harman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Harman v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:06 am
These discovery means are found in the United States and Texas Constitutions and in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Here is a summary of important cases that have been granted a hearing by the Supreme Court: An abandoned FBI vehicle-tracking device/Wired.com United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Spanish Patents and Trademark Office (SPTO) archives (Class 46) Spains 350 Super Brands revealed (Class 46) Taiwan French luxury goods producer Hermes won a record US $7.5 million in damages in a trade mark infringement case brought against a former employee who had sold four counterfeit handbags (IPKat) (Reuters) United Kingdom UK copyright tribunal modernisation (Excess Copyright), (IPKat) The Patents, Trade Marks and Designs (Address for… [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 5:10 am
This got me thinking of Alexis de Tocqueville, who famously said that “[s]carcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity? [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Most men in America would not take this bargain, and they would feel the requirement of forced labor by the state as a serious imposition on their lives. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SHORT TITLE section 1. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
The resolution made sense then, and still does. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 11:14 am
In Madey v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:49 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bivens v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:30 am
Last fall, President Trump announced he was preparing an executive order that would deny birthright citizenship to children born in the United States to parents unlawfully in the country, notwithstanding the Justice Department’s consistent stance that such a move would violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Half a million people outside North America play Scrabble on Facebook. 2.4 million people have downloaded the SCRABBLE app for iOS. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 3:38 pm
" - Winston Churchill (United States Constitution) © 2006-2009 Sex Offender Issues , All Rights Reserved [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]