Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 6,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
Do you read and write English? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
. - In the matter of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 4:07 am
Moscati on developments in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
The first was on The State of Creativity: The Future of 3D Printing, 4D Printing and Augmented Reality. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:18 am
All of these cases involved an argument esoteric to IP cases (and other cases) under English procedure. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Court of appeal of Brussels, 13 October 2022, Mylan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:04 pm
Said the Commission, the term ‘Tokaj’ appeared in the national provisions, not on its own but as part of compound terms consisting of a number of words, such as ‘Vinohradnícka oblasť Tokaj’, ‘Akostné víno pochádzajúce z vinohradníckej oblasti Tokaj’ or ‘Tokajské víno’. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
Even though the words of Article 13 are not expressly reflected in the English Trade Marks Act, the UK’s registrar of Trade Mark, whose task is to implement Article 13 on behalf of the State in Registry proceedings in the UK, must give effect to the binding provisions of Article 13. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Celní úrad Tabor) - the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 6:48 am
Massanari, 266 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2001), citing Anastasoff v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:56 am
Though the question presented was quite narrow and technical, the split in Artis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:09 am
For example, in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
Reed, in which the Court ruled that English law, not New York law, governed the plaintiff’s standing in a shareholder derivative suit involving Barclays, an English entity. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
