Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
Hart Publishing announces Entick v Carrington: 250 Years of the Rule of Law, edited by Adam Tomkins, John Millar Professor of Public Law at the University of Glasgow, and Paul Scott, Lecturer in Public Law at the University of Southampton.Entick v Carrington is one of the canons of English public law and in 2015 it is 250 years old. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
You can read the story in full in English, plus a scanned version of the agreement in question -- in Polish only -- here. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
In the House of Lords, the Chagos Islands case (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61) because of the historical constitutional and international legal interest and its continuing ramifications which one follows both internationally and actually domestically. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:25 am
Estate of Howell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 5:25 am
Estate of Howell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
” Fintak at 184 (citing Head v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
” Fintak at 184 (citing Head v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:01 am
California has reached a settlement in DJ v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:32 am
This would be because this piece of EU legislation does not allow Member States to allocate a portion of the fair compensation to the publishers if there is no obligation for the publishers to ensure that they pass on this part, directly or indirectly, to the authors.In its analysis the ECS endorsed the AG Opinion on this point, and submitted that the CJEU should (re-)affirm the author principle, ie initial ownership of copyright for authors. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
The federal district court’s decision last week (Issa v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Animal rights organisation People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has taken legal action in the United States on the monkey’s behalf (apparently named Naruto), claiming that the animal owns the copyright in the successful photographs and should therefore reap the benefits financially. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:07 pm
Hartley expressed his views on the case and explained new strategies developed under English law to protect the effects of choice of court agreements, like the one shown in AMT Futures Limited v. [read post]
