Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 15,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2019, 7:55 am
This was the circumstance facing United Western Bank, whose eight-year wait for a $4 million refund gave rise to Rodriguez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
Where We Started: Energizer In Energizer Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm
Where We Started: Energizer In Energizer Battery, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:01 am
*Postscript: Since the decision in TSWA v Isetan, TSWA recently enjoyed another victory in Europe (reported here). [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:30 pm
Also for correction, since one way or another, the “biography” made Marshall’s canonical opinion in Gibbons v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 3:54 pm
In his attempt to have the defamation lawsuit dismissed, Musk tried to claim that, because of his involvement in the very public rescue of the group of boys, Unsworth should be classified as a public figure, but Judge Stephen V. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 2:42 pm
On exemplary damages, the £4,000 figure was in line with the guideline cases. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
While there was no announcement, the worst kept secret at Greenbuild is that USGBC is that the work on LEED v 5 (.. in lieu of v 4.2) will soon commence in earnest. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
Whether a mark is registered in colour or in black is not regarded as a wholly negligible element in the eyes of consumers (Pico Food v OHIM, T‑623/11).There are also differences between the dominant elements of the marks at issue: the human figure in the earlier mark represents a man standing on one foot, whereas the lower limbs of the human figure in the mark applied for are not depicted. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
I hope the following links, excerpts, comments, and reflections (in no particular order) will prove of interest for one reason or another to our readers. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:20 am
Tang v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:03 am
Standing Bear, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
But, the figures are below. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court addressed this issue in its January 25, 2019 decision in the Rosenbach v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:54 am
For example, in Andrews v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:22 am
" Recot Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 1:06 pm
Peak Health Center v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:03 am
Nijhof explained to what extent courts in other jurisdictions do or do not believe that Huawei v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 6:40 pm
The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Google v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
Patricia Schmitz v. [read post]
