Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 3361 - 3380 of 37,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2018, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Turning to the wording of the texts in question, the ECtHR considers that the impugned statements can be divided into three groups and it examines each group separately. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Legal Talk Network
Margaret Stock is an attorney from the Cascadia Cross Border Law Group LLC out of Anchorage Alaska, and a former law professor at the United States Military Academy at West Point, N.Y. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:10 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lloyds Tsb Bank Plc v Markandan & Uddin (a firm) [2012] EWCA Civ 65 (09 February 2012) Foss v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2012] EWCA Civ 80 (09 February 2012) Cambridge v Makin [2012] EWCA Civ 85 (09 February 2012) Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council v Salisbury Independent Living Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 84 (09 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Court, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 133 (09… [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 12:03 pm by Thomas Dowdell (US)
  These policy initiatives are:  (i) extend federal funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program; (ii) stabilize the Affordable Care Act insurance exchanges/marketplaces; (iii) implement tools to incentivize individuals to sign up for health insurance; (iv) provide greater flexibility to state governments in designing health programs; and (v) expand access to, and usage of, Health Savings Accounts. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  The most important case was the “celebrity threesome” case of PJS v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:24 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
“In sum, ours is not a color-blind society, and race still matters,” the groups state in their 38-page brief. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
Thus, the district court said, the state was the real party in interest, rather than a discrete group of Arizona homeowners, and CAFA does not apply. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:56 pm
The First Court of Appeals has ordered expedited briefing in the Medina v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:47 pm by MEL
Benson Group Inc. that where a fixed-term contract does not contain an enforceable termination provision, a discharged employee is entitled to payment for the unexpired portion of the contract. [read post]