Search for: "High v State"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
The opinion, Prometheus v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
We here at the Law Blogger see this as the civil rights issue of our time.As often stated by Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, the sooner the High Court decides this issue, the better, for everyone.www.clarkstonlegal.cominfo@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:33 am
Correa, People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
On appeal, the state high court agreed with the defendants, ruling that state law protects landowners who invite or permit members of the public to use their property for recreational purposes from liability for injuries sustained by members of the public. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Intermountain Stroke Center, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 9:32 am
The Court’s June 19 decision in Lane v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:13 am
The Delhi High Court held that a court of one state (i.e. the Wuhan Court) cannot bar the parties from pursuing the dispute at a forum in another state (i.e. the Delhi court), when this foreign forum has the competent jurisdiction to hear the case. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
[This post follows up on my previous post on this judgment on this blog.]In Koushal v Naz—the case being touted as one of its worst judgments—a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court recently overturned a 2009 decision of Delhi High Court which had struck down the criminalisation of sodomy by s 377 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 as unconstitutional. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:55 pm
Generally, federal courts sitting in diversity can decide cases involving unresolved issues of state law by predicting how a state’s high court would rule. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:21 am
Kommer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:39 am
It’s an interesting case, but it drew even more attention because of the close parallels to last year’s high-profile decision in Burwell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:59 am
Supreme Court decision of Cummings v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 am
High Court [2014] 1 All ER (Comm) 942 (Field J) SOMO challenged the orders on the grounds of want of jurisdiction and state immunity. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
Or that the high level executives take the profits for themselves and don't put it back into the company? [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 4:41 am
In D.A. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of… [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
In Wisconsin v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:15 am
SG resisted the application to amend the patent, stating that it would not be ready to deal with the application. [read post]
