Search for: "House v. House" Results 3361 - 3380 of 41,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
ZH v Tanzania and Birmingham v Clue were distinguishable because they were cases concerning potential deportation, whereas in the present case A had the option of remaining in the UK if he chose to seek housing in the private sector (a consideration which A argued was unlawful).Held: The appeal was allowed. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
ZH v Tanzania and Birmingham v Clue were distinguishable because they were cases concerning potential deportation, whereas in the present case A had the option of remaining in the UK if he chose to seek housing in the private sector (a consideration which A argued was unlawful).Held: The appeal was allowed. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
I spent a summer after high school living with my then-girlfriend at her parent's house in Canoga Park. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:44 am by SECLaw Staff
When the U.S. housing market was showing signs of distress, Citigroup structured and marketed Class V III and exercised significant influence over the selection of $500 million of the assets included in the CDO. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The police get a "crime stoppers" tip that a house is a marijuana grow house. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm by Giles Peaker
Following R (Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 [our report] and Alemi, R (on the application of) v Westminster City Council [2015] EWHC 1765 (Admin) [our report], it was not permissible to set qualifying [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
Imam, R (On the Application Of) v The London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) This is the judgment in a judicial review claim seeking a declaration that Croydon was in breach of its statutory duty under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 to provide suitable accommodation, and for mandatory relief, that Croydon provide suitable accommodation, and consider the claimant’s application for band 1 housing priority. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]