Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 3361 - 3380
of 18,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
Review Granted In re Lamps Plus Overtime Cases, S194064—Review Granted and Held—July 20, 2011 The court ordered briefing deferred pending consideration and disposition of the related case of Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
John McCain, et al., v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
Condition 5 was at issue in this case, and lucky for the court, Mr Justice Laddie had considered this condition in detail in Glaxo Group & Ors v Dowelhurst Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 529. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:46 am
Even when you're not so sure that's really the most economically rational decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 12:21 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court grated certiorari in Dada v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:30 am
See Narvaez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
B.J.T. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
(If you’re in a hurry, feel free to skip to Part III. ) There are two particularly relevant opinions, and both offer uncertain guidance. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:42 am
In short, the justices replaced the “de minimis” framework and the precedent set in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:32 am
There is no parole in the Federal penal system -- if you're sentenced to serve 20 years, you're going to serve 20 years. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:35 pm
They're true even if you don't believe them. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
(Similar concerns surrounded the use of ancestry in Rice v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:52 pm
(Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
The discourse about Moore v. [read post]
