Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 10,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
’"Since “calendrical exactitude” wasn’t a requisite, the appellate court concluded that dismissal predicated on a violation of the “`time when’ requirement,” was improvidently granted, and the matter was sent the matter back for consideration of the State’s other grounds for having the case thrown out.Interestingly, when the CVA passed, Letitia James, the State’s Attorney General, released the following… [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:17 am
The narrow 5-4 decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:16 am
This individualist conception of popular sovereignty was articulated by Chief Justice John Jay and Justice James Wilson in the Supreme Court’s first great constitutional case of Chishom v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:37 am
And remember I warned you” (Edwards v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:11 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Ali Hakim a/k/a Jesse James Williams v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 12:17 pm
A number of interesting articles have recently been published addressing the Court’s decision last Term in Caperton v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
In Zurcher v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:12 pm
City of Irvine v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am
Al-Bihani v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 4:50 am
This week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court: This Wednesday, April 30th: 9:00 AM - James Butler v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 8:01 am
Felicity Barringer of the NY Times reports today on yesterday's DC Circuit opinion in Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
"Detailed analysis of Federal Circuit hearing in Oracle v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am
Election Law Blog and Appellate Daily highlight snippets of Justice Stevens’ interview with 60 Minutes (which James mentioned yesterday). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
James J. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
The court may ‘continue the action, even though the state law under its statute of limitations might not allow relation back and would require dismissal.' 3A James Wm. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:48 am
PDF version A review of James E. [read post]
