Search for: "John Doe D" Results 3361 - 3380 of 9,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2007, 7:01 pm by Can I go home now??
John Doe was actually in my opinion, quite lucid. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 2:07 am
That the artist admits to despising Palin comes as no surprise, does it? [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:15 am by Matt Osenga
  In an exchange with Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), Kappos responded that “[w]e have a heritage opportunity on the part of the intellectual property system to pass legislation that has been generations in the making and badly needed. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:18 am by FDABlog HPM
Karst –        Earlier this week, Representatives John Carney (D-DE) and Larry Bucshon (R-IN) introduced H.R.3839, the “Drug Shortage Prevention Act,” which, according to its sponsors, is intended to bring “more efficiency to the manufacturing and distribution processes” and to require “FDA to take action to prevent drug shortage problems before they begin impacting patients. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
Personally I thought the story a promising hybrid between the great works of John Mortimer (Rumpole) infused with a feel of James Herriot. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
"     Highways and Transit Subcommittee Chairman John Duncan, Jr. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
John Elwood provides an unadorned roll of Monday’s relists. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:53 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Cybersecurity Oversight and Defense — A Board and Management Imperative Posted by John F. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
John Duffy previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:45 pm by Jeffrey K. Walker
In federal acquisition parlance, this is the infamous “termination for default” or T for D. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
But when he does not kneel with sufficient urgency, the officer hits him in the back of the neck. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:44 pm by Steve Vladeck
Here, I’d like to flag two central issues with the decision that, in my view, are worth reflecting upon: I. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (barely) reviews Mondays’ suspected relists. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 11:21 am by Giles Peaker
(Crucially, the D&CC did not raise any issue of the reasonableness of the amount of the charge, or contesting the s.20 consultation procedure). [read post]