Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Alito, Jr., Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:43 am
Justices Scalia concurs, with Justice Thomas, to say Flast should be overruled altogether, and not just costrained. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:06 am
Kennedy joined the ruling in full. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:59 am
Justice Scalia filed a concurring opinion, which was joined by Justice Thomas. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:22 am
Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the majority reasoned that the taxpayers could not avail themselves of the narrow exception to the general rule against taxpayer standing created by Flast v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:38 pm
Nicholas Burns, The Sultan of Oman Professor of the Practice of International Relations, Harvard Kennedy School of Government; Sarah Leah Whitson, Executive Director, Middle East and North Africa Division, Human Rights Watch (below left); Dirk Vandewalle, Associate Professor of Government, Dartmouth College; and Philippa Thomas, Nieman Fellow, Harvard University & Foreign Correspondent, BBC (below right). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Kennedy and Alito. -- To discuss the case, we have Evan A. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Thompson was the classic case in which the Justices were sharply divided on ideological lines: Justice Thomas wrote an opinion for the majority that was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Scalia, and Alito; meanwhile, Justice Ginsburg felt so strongly about her dissent (which was joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) that she read it from the bench, an action that a Justice will rarely take unless she is well and truly peeved by the majority’s… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
Everybody knows we’re interested in prescription drug preemption. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
Justice Thomas was joined by Justices Alioto, Kennedy, Roberts, and Scalia. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
Paul Kennedy calls it "just plain wrong. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:11 pm
Nicholas Burns, The Sultan of Oman Professor of the Practice of International Relations, Harvard Kennedy School of Government (Principle Presenter) Sarah Leah Whitson, Executive Director, Middle East and North Africa Division, Human Rights Watch Dirk Vandewalle, Associate Professor of Government, Dartmouth College Philippa Thomas, Nieman Journalism Fellow, Harvard University Logistics What: Live Web Seminar on "The Crisis in Libya: The International Response" When:… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
Justice Thomas was the only Justice who declined to ask any questions. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:54 am
Thompson (09-571) – In a five-four opinion by Justice Thomas that was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Scalia, and Alito, the Court reversed the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
Finally, at Slate, Dahlia Lithwick suggests that “there is no principle” that the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito “will fight harder to preserve than the right of the impossibly wealthy to purchase as much speech as they want and need to win a political campaign. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:08 pm
Presumably too, the Justices on the Supreme Court who are simply hostile to the abortion right (Scalia and Thomas, at least) would not engage with the question of whether three or seven days is too long: They'd be happy to uphold a nine-month waiting period! [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:05 am
And, in response to Kennedy’s leading question, the challengers’ lawyer, William R. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:33 am
Swing Justices are O’Connor and Kennedy. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:44 am
Hogan Lovells' Ellen Kennedy and Thomas Widor worked pro bono with prosecutors and the Innocence Project to get haynesworth released. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger concludes that the case“[l]ooks like 4-4 with Justice Kennedy in the middle,” while Jesse Holland of the Associated Press is more confident that the Court is “ready to force courts to consider age when examining whether a child in custody and must be given Miranda rights. [read post]
