Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 3361 - 3380 of 6,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
This would certainly appear to be a directive by the second highest federal law enforcement officer in the country to ignore the law of the United States Supreme Court.The last two years in the Sixth Circuit has seen the parallel development of two distinct bodies of law on post-Booker practice that appears to have finally led to some kind of en banc resolution. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
Historically speaking, women have come a long way in the field of law. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Aurora Barnes
Davis 17-6883 Issue: Whether—when the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am by Michael O'Brien
 I call this a Davis objection because Chief Judge MacBride's opinion in Davis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
 Section 1983 confers a private federal right of action against any person who, acting under color of state law, deprives an individual of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution or federal laws. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Joshua Matz
” In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
New Jersey law has adopted the single publication rule and applies it to publications on the Internet. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:27 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Riverside attorney Stewart Albertson of Albertson & Davidson on the firm's blog, California Trust, Probate & Estate Litigation Shriver/Schwarzenegger Separation: A legal perspective - Boston and Hingham based lawyer Nancy Van Tine on her Massachusetts Divorce Law Monitor Between a Tweet and a Hard Place: The Challenges of Social Networking for Hospitality Employers - Jenna Mooney and Nicholas Kampars of Davis Wright Tremaine on the firm's… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Dec. 23, 2008) (upholding trial court’s finding of fraud); Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
6 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428). [read post]