Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 3361 - 3380 of 21,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2020, 1:25 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
In the subject case, the plaintiff-mother was the plaintiff-child’s custodial adult, and therefore the defendant had a duty to obtain the plaintiff-mother’s informed consent prior to treating the child. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 12:30 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
A car accident in Long Beach evolved into a lawsuit over whether a car insurer had satisfied the covenant of good faith and fair dealing on behalf of the defendant. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
  The district court applied California’s choice of law rules to find that California law would apply, and thus denied the defendants motion for summary judgment. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Sharifi Firm, APC
Historically, courts have only overruled a defendants summary judgment motion in talc asbestos cases when the plaintiff presented expert testimony on the issue of contamination and exposure. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
  Both, for example, predate Basic, the Supreme Court's most relevant exposition of materiality. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:38 pm
He claimed that as Forrest’s principals, Associated Securities Corp., Associated Financial Group Inc., and Associated Planners Investment Advisory Inc. should be held liable. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:00 am
The landfill operations were conducted, with Utzig’s permission, by the other defendants Alpha Manufacturing Inc., Burns Developments Ltd. and Burns Developments (1993) Ltd. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
The applicable federal law, 47 USC 230 (Section 230), has been on the books for over 20 years, and it’s extremely clear: websites aren’t liable for third party content. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:37 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The First District rebuffed the trial court’s conclusion that a Rule 224 petition is only appropriate in circumstances when a petitioner does not know the identity of any parties that could potentially be liable for the alleged defamation. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:54 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court for the District of Arizona, a jury found ASARCO liable on Aguilar’s sexual harassment claims, but not on her constructive discharge or retaliation claims. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:21 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The New Jersey statute specifically states that damage awards should include “the gross income or value to the defendant of the injured party’s labor or services. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:34 am by John Day
New York's highest court has ruled that the claim of bus passengers injured in a single-vehicle bus wreck which sought to hold the bus manufacturer liable for the failure to install  passenger seatbelts on the bus were not preempted by federal regulations promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 6:56 am by Cecere Santana Castrillon, P.A.
The plaintiff filed a personal injury lawsuit against the defendant, arguing that under the state’s strict liability dog-bite statute, the defendant was liable for her injuries. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:04 pm by JacksonWhite Law
There also should be sufficient proof that the defendants actions put another person in considerable apprehension of imminent physical injury. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:44 am by Mack Sperling
Defendant said that the Plaintiff's breach had met the requirement that its actions induced Kaplan's decision to refrain from entering into the Joint Venture, because the breach had caused Kaplan's decision to decide to refuse to go ahead with the Joint Venture. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The judge granted summary judgment on the false advertising claim, while the jury found Butler (and other defendants) liable for trademark infringement and cybersquatting. [read post]