Search for: "Lock v. State"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 3,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
That is what trade dress protection can accomplish.In their fascinating new essay, "The Coca-Cola Bottle: A Fragile Vessel for Building a Brand," which is forthcoming in Legal Applications of Marketing Theory (Gersen & Steckel, eds), Jacob Gersen and Scott Hemphill tell the history of how The Coca-Cola Company (hereafter "Coke") secured lock-tight trade dress protection in the distinctive shapes of its bottles. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
November Reasonably Suspicious Podcast: Let me be your lawyer dog, or I won't be your man at all ...
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 pm
Indeed, in one of the seminal residency cases, Whittell v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
For the last decade and a half, that justice has almost always been Justice Stevens, and he has used the power with patience and skill to forge and maintain alliances in major liberal victories, often locking in Justice Anthony M. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am
And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
THE CAUSE RIGHT NOW IS UNDER INVESTIGATION AND AND TAKING A LOOK NOW AT THE SUPREME COURT, THIS MORNING, TODAY MARKS TWO YEARS SINCE THE DOBBS DECISION THAT STRUCK DOWN ROE V WADE AND PAVED THE WAY FOR RESTRICTIONS IN SEVERAL STATES. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm
Minteer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
The Balancing Act – Avoiding Attorney General Oversight and Approval v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:55 pm
The Balancing Act – Avoiding Attorney General Oversight and Approval v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:12 am
Posted by Edmund R. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 6:58 pm
First, Troxel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:29 am
------------------------"The United States incarcerates more people than any country in the world," said the Pew Center on the States, in a report released February 28, 2008, One in 100: Behind Bars In America 2008. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
It also alleges that because the properties are part of the Hoey’s marital estate they “can be transferred/assigned” by Thomas to Wendy “as part of a separation/divorce without obtaining” Becker’s consent “[n]otwithstanding the fact that there is a partnership [sic] agreement which states that any sale and/or conveyance must be by unanimous consent. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
It also alleges that because the properties are part of the Hoey’s marital estate they “can be transferred/assigned” by Thomas to Wendy “as part of a separation/divorce without obtaining” Becker’s consent “[n]otwithstanding the fact that there is a partnership [sic] agreement which states that any sale and/or conveyance must be by unanimous consent. [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:12 pm
Weglarz v. [read post]
