Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 3361 - 3380 of 13,719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
 - Charles Baudelaire [T]his is a case about beer and a case of beer is a serious matter. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 5:21 am by SHG
Same with a plumber and carpenter, for that matter, since there are times things need to be plumbed and carped, but I digress. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division's decision, sustaining Supreme Court's granting a probationary employee's CPLR Article 78 petition challenging the appointing authority's decision to terminate her from the position, is set out below: In the Matter of Antonia F. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division's decision, sustaining Supreme Court's granting a probationary employee's CPLR Article 78 petition challenging the appointing authority's decision to terminate her from the position, is set out below: In the Matter of Antonia F. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 4:10 am
Milkiewicz, 470 F.3d 390, 395-400 (1st Cir. 2006) (our coverage here), as based on information already entered into evidence. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:17 am by SHG
It didn’t involve any shiny iToys, and so it died. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:11 am by Andrew Trask
A skeptic may rejoin, "but the garden variety consumer class action sees very minimal exercise of opt outs, so it really doesn’t matter if you offer class members this option." [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:05 am
    However, Nebbia hearings may come up in any criminal matter to ensure that the bond or conditions imposed will reasonably assure the defendant's presence at trial. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:46 am
But just because it's mature litigation doesn't mean that the old dog can't do new tricks. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Substantively, there are only a couple of questions that really matter about the precedential implications of this ruling: 1) Will more 512(f) plaintiffs succeed in court? [read post]