Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 3361 - 3380
of 120,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 9:00 am
Earlier this week, a jury in the Northern District of California found that Google violated copyright laws when it used Java APIs to design Android—but could not reach a resolution on whether Google’s use of APIs constituted fair use. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:53 am
v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:05 pm
Brenda Butler v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
Ashcroft in 2003 and in Islamic American Relief Agency v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moor v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court is currently hearing a series of joined cases concerning extradition and the rights of children including KAS or H v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0217, BH v The Lord Advocate UKSC 2011/0210 , F-K (FC) v Polish Judicial Authority UKSC 2012/0039, R (on the application of HH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0128 and R (on the application of PH) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa UKSC 2011/0129. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 10:11 pm
In Greene v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:03 pm
May 12, 2009). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:55 am
If that is the case, in fact, the second medicinal product would not enjoy the data and market exclusivity as provided for by the Directive.The General Court expressed a restrictive view, stating that the first authorisation of a medicinal product containing a certain active ingredient used in combination for a certain disease prevents the enjoyment of market and data exclusivity on a second medicinal product using the same mono-substance for a different use. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
While this may seem like it is the exact same facts as Kirtsaeng, there was a key difference. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
While this may seem like it is the exact same facts as Kirtsaeng, there was a key difference. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
While this may seem like it is the exact same facts as Kirtsaeng, there was a key difference. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:43 am
Recently, in the case of Carlson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Wilkes v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
TEKsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court recently granted review in Mitchell v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:36 am
IQ Biometrix, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm
Clements-Jeffrey v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:51 pm
So more changes may be on the way. [read post]
