Search for: "Mark"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 135,551
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
Ava Enterprises opposed, claiming that Applicant's mark is likely to cause confusion with its registered mark BOSS for automobile audio components. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
The marks seem kinda similar to me. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
When a product is “properly marked with other patents,” as here, the competitor “must show that the falsely marked patent[ ]” caused its injury and “that—for some reason—the properly marked patent[ ] did not. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:30 am
Mark Levine for State Senate Dear Friend,Thanks to the grassroots support of people like you, our campaign continues to shock the political establishment. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:12 am
Mark P. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 4:17 am
It found the mark likely to cause confusion with the famous mark L'EGGS, registered and previously used for hosiery and panty hose. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:25 am
(Left-click on each picture for larger view)Implicit in the definition of "use in commerce" for a service mark, said the Board, is the requirement of "a direct association between the mark and the services, i.e., that the mark be used in such a manner that it would readily be perceived as identifying the source of the services. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
In the same year, Telstra applied to register the colour yellow as a trade mark. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 3:04 am
The mark was opposed on the grounds that use of the contested mark by MCN could be prevented by virtue of the law of passing off (s. 10(4)(a), Trade Marks Act 1996), that the application was made in bad faith (s. 8(4)(b)) and that there was no bona fide intention for the mark to be used (s. 37(2)). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
The Court of Appeal's decisionThe Defendants' appeal was, in summary, based on the following two grounds: That it is not necessary for the proprietor of the earlier trade mark to be aware of the registration of the later trade mark in order for time to run: it is sufficient that the later trade mark is in fact registered and that the proprietor of the earlier trade mark is aware of the use of the later trade mark; andWhere the later… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:46 pm
Despite the strength of General Cable's "Roleaux" mark (below right), and the similarity between that mark and National Rural's design mark (below left), the Board dismissed this Section 2(d) opposition. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:20 am
We have been keeping an eye on developments in the dispute over the APP STORE mark. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:47 pm
Other writings on false marking can be found here. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:27 am
," finding that the mark had acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 4:05 am
” The Section 2(d) likelihood-of-confusion analysis does not change when the cited registration is for a certification mark; however, because the owner of a certification mark does not itself use the mark, the determination of likelihood of confusion is based on use of the cited mark by the certification mark users. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:04 am
Opposer Executive Coach purchased the ARMBRUSTER/STAGEWAY mark and other assets in 1993. [read post]
29 May 2014, 2:48 am
It found the involved marks to be (not surprisingly) identical, opposer's mark CHANEL to be highly distinctive, opposer's use of its mark to be substantially exclusive, and consumer recognition of oppoers' mark to be high. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:22 am
Below is the graphical representation and description of the trade marks as found on the UKIPO Trade Marks Registry: 'The mark is limited to the colour red. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
As technology changes, shouldtrade mark owners be able to amend trade mark registrations? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:22 am
What better way to know Mark Twain than through his writings? [read post]
