Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 19,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
This provides: "Unless otherwise provided in this Regulation, a Community trade mark court shall apply the rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark in the Member State in which the court is located. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In the initial decision in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, the judge denied the motion for an injunction and stated that Louboutin’s trade mark was "likely not enforceable". [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:11 am
"The Board found the mark to be at most suggestive of the goods. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:55 am
Did you know that in 1935 applicant built the world’s largest grand piano, for the Silver Jubilee of King George V and Queen Mary? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
" United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:47 pm
I thank Attorney Mark A. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:19 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
” At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers the justices’ denial of review in Doe v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
Dwayne Meadows) v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:33 am
Liberty Bell Equipment Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
This very question was addressed a few days ago in the judgment that the General Court (GC) rendered in Zdút v EUIPO, T-250/21 (NEHRA). [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:22 pm
"High court to hear enemy combatant case": Mark Sherman of The Associated Press has a report that begins, "The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the president may order that people picked up in the United States be detained indefinitely and without criminal charges. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:30 am
Mark A Karl, No. 33211, slip op. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that “in dozens of education cases in his more than 34 years on the court,” Stevens “was a voice for student rights, racial equality, and a high wall of separation between church and state. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 2:44 am
It stated that it did not have money to produce the product. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:05 am
Buchanan v. [read post]
