Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 3361 - 3380
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 5:13 pm
This post was written by Mark Mustian. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Judge Blackburn cited two cases in support of his authority to enter such an order: United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:22 am
As his recent Legal 500 entry states, Tom is as "smooth as silk, and no doubt he will be one soon. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
Second, although Lord Carnwath favoured effective supervision as the general rationale for a common law obligation to give reasons, the obligation could be justified in the present case (as in Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council [2017] 2 P & CR 4, [2017] EWCA Civ 71: see Mark Elliott’s post) on the basis that “openness and fairness to objectors required the members’ reasons to be stated” (at para 57,… [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Anna Maria Stein reviewed a recent EUIPO BoA’s decision, which stated that a 3D trade mark described as a “heart-based bread roll” is devoid of the necessary minimum degree of distinctive character. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
DeSena v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
Bosch and Mark J. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
In a Decision handed down on April 22, 2016, the Honorable Mark G. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
Gallegos, supra (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 4:44 pm
The Ninth Circuit utilizes the eight-factor test of AMF Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:36 pm
In Bachar v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:13 am
486/07, Ford Motor Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Unnecessarily Long and Pompous Name), Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm
Arguing for Mark A. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
” As the Court of Appeals said in Chittenden v Wurster, 152 NY 345, the civil divisions of the State are its counties and its towns and its villages. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:14 pm
” Mozes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:59 am
The Third Department was confronted with such a situation on June 7th in Matter of Fireman's Assn. of State of New York v French Am. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 9:42 pm
Defendants have not yet answered Topline’s complaint or responded to the motion.The case cite is The Topline Corp. v. 4273371 Canada, Inc., No. 07-0938 (W.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 9:28 am
KG v Swingward Ltd (that's the short version of the case name, which covers a whole side of A4): this was a re-referred case from the UK on a variety of questions relating to trade mark infringement where a trader buys an original pharma manufacturer's trade mark-protected goods and repackages them, relabels or overstickers them or otherwise makes the appearance of the packaging look quite different. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 pm
From Riseandshine Corp. v. [read post]
