Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 9:07 pm
I’m only a voter. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
(C) Hence, the Due Process Clause does not bar Shi's prosecution.But (C) does not follow from (A) and (B). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Ranbaxy and AstraZeneca reach agreement in Esomeprazole patent litigation: (SmartBrief), (IPBiz), (Spicy IP), (Profitability through Simplicity), (IP Law360), (Philip Brooks), (GenericsWeb), Cadbury loses Australian battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law… [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 8:14 am
I can't say I'm surprised. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:03 am
Judge Shannon raised an interesting issue with respect to the standards governing how a bankruptcy judge, or any judge for that matter, determines if a claim is "colorable" and worthy of pursuit by a committee. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
B. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:34 am
b. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 4:47 am
" Of course, different judges will have different beliefs about the crucial questions, such as (a) what are the true principels underlying a given constitutional provision, (b) what is the original public meaning (or semantic content) of the constitutional text, (c) does the existing doctrine adequately serve the text and principles. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
B. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (The Invent Blog),Brand promise and IP strategy: (IP ThinkTank),Cybersquatters have reached record numbers, says WIPO: (WIPO), (Ars Technica), (IPKat)Global - PatentsForbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz),More on Bessen and Meurer and their book ‘Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers put Innovators at Risk’: (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
This is a long post, so I'm putting the rest of it after the jump. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 7:07 am
C might agree to buy D's auto "as is," through some listserv that specifies remedies for fraud or disappointment. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
I'm guessing they chose not to b/c they had nothing to lose and everything to gain by having the court adjudicate the question of 35 USC 121 to CIPs. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Fred Jackson, Ronald Smith, and Ray M. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:42 am
Scruggs matter pending before Judge Henry Lackey. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:29 am
As I mentioned, I'm not sure the anti-concurrent cause language added anything here. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:47 am
Is it any wonder that I'm not a law school dean? [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:47 pm
Lyons and Urvi Neelakantan Measuring What Really Matters to Consumers Robert N. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
Paul Graham shares his product development strategy in a wonderful essay:Here it is: I like to find (a) simple solutions (b) to overlooked problems (c) that actually need to be solved, and (d) deliver them as informally as possible, (e) starting with a very crude version 1, then (f) iterating rapidly. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:The European call for copyright extension for performers: (John Carroll), (The IP Factor), (Spicy IP), (Public Knowledge), (IPR-Helpdesk), (Techdirt), (Innovationpartners),Full CAFC to reexamine the scope of subject matter patentability for business methods, also to consider whether it is appropriate to reconsider or overrule State Street Bank… [read post]
