Search for: "Mays v. Paul"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 7,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2014, 5:07 pm
Owens v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:58 pm
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this Henderson decision may contact me at dancummins@comcast.net.I send thanks to Attorney Scott Cooper of the Harrisburg law firm of Schmidt Kramer and Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
Here's my post, which covers the argument for Hobby Lobby by Paul Clement and ends without getting to Solicitor General Donald Verrilli's argument against the religious exemption the company seeks. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:01 am
Retired Justice John Paul Stevens stated in a recent speech to the Federal Bar Council that he would have sided with the dissent if he was still serving at the time of the judgment in Snyder v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
On January 15, Judge Paul Friedman of the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
But some of the tough, federal penalties for trafficking in, for example, marijuana may be in need of downward revision. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 am
Circuit panel may be another story. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
But in Sherbert v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
ROBERT JEFFERSON v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:31 pm
No such person has been found since the post-Furman v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:30 pm
The consolidated cases are Sebelius v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:56 pm
Category: 103 By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor TitleApple Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
In a March 6, 2014 Opinion and Order, the Honorable Paul A. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:43 am
Circuit case is U.S. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
Notably, Justice Hugo Black stated in his opinion: The right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fundamental and essential to fair trials in some countries, but it is in ours. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 3:53 pm
Automattic's are two of the highest-profile suits under that section since we began representing Stephanie Lenz in Lenz v. [read post]
