Search for: "Murphy's Case" Results 3361 - 3380 of 4,623
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 12:29 pm by Rebecca McCray, Center for Justice
Laura Murphy, Director of the ACLU's Washington Legislative Office, has worked on this issue  for almost 20 years. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:43 pm
Fed Blotter is Threat Level's weekly roundup of computer crime cases in the federal courts. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:16 am
In this case, given the absence of individualized suspicion, probable cause, a legislative act endorsing this type of DNA collection, or "special needs" to justify that collection, Appellees' forcible collection of Koch's DNA was unreasonable. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 8:24 am by Nassiri Law
Phil Murphy has signed into law Bill AI/SI04, which sanctions employers for gender pay disparities between employees with the same responsibilities. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 12:56 am
We agree with the analysis of the appellate court in Murphy and find, in the present case-which also indisputably involves a contract of adhesion that the provision in the arbitration agreement giving the arbitrator exclusive authority to decide enforceability issues is unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable. [read post]
Aside from this latest change, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy recently signed a bill to allow 17-year-olds to vote in the state’s primaries. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am by Andrew Appel
  That order was issued in the Clinic’s case Gusciora v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
”  Dissent in United States v Ballard Chief Justice Harlan Stone authored a dissent, which was joined by Justices Black, Reed,Murphy, and Rutledge. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
[Murphy v Kenneth Cole Productions, 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007)], but in certain cases, a 1 year filing deadline could apply. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:42 am by Phillips & Associates
One of the newest laws designed to curb discrimination and harassment is AB 3848, which Governor Murphy signed into law on March 20. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
the dictum in Murphy, supra, 40 Cal.4th at pages 1108-1109 ("the Legislature expressly provided that a suit seeking to enforce the section 203 penalty would be subject to the same three-year statute of limitations as an action to recover wages") does not require a contrary conclusion. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 11:15 pm by John Jenkins
” This excerpt from the complaint summarizes the theory of the case: For a corporation whose impact is so widespread, the well-established doctrine of stockholder primacy cannot be rationally applied on behalf of investors without recognizing the impact of portfolio theory, which inextricably links common stock ownership to broad portfolio diversification. [read post]