Search for: "People v High"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 15,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Two high-level sources, one at BCE and another that is participating in negotiations, insisted that the company's embattled board had little appetite for lowering the price of the offer. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
It can thus be seen that the decision has First Amendment implications which safeguard people’s right to free speech and this was valued as being the greater consideration. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:57 am
Nicole Vicknair, or Miss V, has her class at Bidwell making what are called Snug As A Bug Bags. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 8:40 am
US v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:51 am
And, as Nearly Legal pointed out, Pinnock was concerned with a fairly rare “demoted tenancy” held by a small number of people. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
Frankfurter received letters from a number of people a number of people praising the appointment and its breaking of the racial barrier. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 2:19 pm
The judgment follows and references the landmark decision of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights in the case of Lohé Issa Konaté v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:32 am
In the Supreme Court’s case of Demore v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
In this case the elaboration of tropes around presumptions of collective psychologies of peoples. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:50 am
Renfro v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:09 pm
Files: fbnyda_trial_court_order.pdffbopening_brief_in_re_381_search_warrants.pdfRelated Cases: New York v. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:01 pm
- Lobbying high-level government officials may not help resolve a dispute because it can give lower-level officials an excuse to do nothing [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Leary v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
As further evidence of how expensive this litigation is, both sides have a slew of high-priced experts. 1-800 Contacts has 6 experts: Howard Hogan (Gibson Dunn), Dr. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
” (Id. at p. 397; see People ex rel. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm
In this case, the respondent engaged a high volume of agency workers (including the claimant), but the policy did not make it clear that it applied to them. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm
A high probability exists that the justices by a 5-3 vote in Zubik v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:01 am
The only departure from what I'm showing here was in a study (paywalled, alas) of 5,000 people in Holland, in which about 2% remained persistent, high-level offenders (at least with respect to property crimes) into their 70s. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
But, due to the influence - up till now - of Roe v. [read post]
