Search for: "People v J." Results 3361 - 3380 of 7,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
” More than 43,000 people signed the campaign’s petition. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm by Chuck Cosson
“Tool Without a Handle”:  Tools for Terror; Tools for Peace This blog has addressed principles and challenges in countering odious online content – both content which transgresses the law and content which, while odious, is nonetheless protected free expression.[1]  In particular, I’ve touched on regulation of such content, noting principled distinctions between regulation of protected speech and regulation of justifiably restricted content that is illegal even… [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
Ms J had been a Southwark tenant since 1981 and paid the water rate to Southwark with her rent, as do some 37,000 tenants of unmetered Southwark properties. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Feb. 29, 2016) R&J sued Assara and a number of related people eight years ago. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
  In order for a statement to be defamatory, it must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and it must carry a meaning that “[substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the claimant], or has a tendency to do so” (see Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB)). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Festa does not impose a minimum threshold; almost any period of time will suffice: Festa involved 45 days; in J & J Enterprises v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:59 am by Peter Howard Tilem
Rossi, 154 Misc. 2d 616, 587 N.Y.S.2d 511 (1992 Just Ct, Vil of Muttontown 1992, Kaminsky, J.); People v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 3:40 am by J
Which brings us to Raja v Aviram[2016] UKUT 102 (LC). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:15 am by Eric S. Solotoff
The Appellate Division decided this question in the negative in the reported (precedential) case of Landers v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]